Comments on: Innocence Vs Ignorance

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:38:35 +0000

Spark thnx for ur rite-up on Ignorance n innocence…I conform with ur statemet “innocence out of ignorance looks natural and beautiful but innocence through knowledge is cultural and charisma”.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:40:10 +0000

SORRY FOR TYPING MISTAKE …READ UNSATISFIED SOCRETES RATHER THAN A SATISFIED PIG

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:38:40 +0000

innnocence bring ignorance…ignorance brings satisfaction…!
Mill SAYS ”I would like to be an unsatisfied Socretes ratehr then a satisfied Pig!”
The child has innocence out of ignorance..
The aim FOR SELF DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE INNOCENCE THROUGH KNOWLEDGE.
Plan is keep childhood innocence intact while aquring the knowledge….and for that retrospection..corrections..improvement are needed…
innocence out of ignorance looks natural and beautiful but innocence through knowledge is cultural and charisma….
suggest to raed in detail the Life of Lord Krishna…..childhood and youth..how he has demonstarted the culture and charisma..is subject matter …as after all we do not grasp philosophy ..but we grasp the character…and learn philosphy through their life.(lecture ends LOL)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 03 Dec 2005 09:42:42 +0000

Kaustubh thnx for ur views on this but we do have difference of opinion…Raj has very well posted on wht I wud really subscribe for…thnx Raj for being here

By: Raj

Raj — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:53:36 +0000

ignorance is plain lack of knowledge.I can mean being illiterate, under educated, not skilled, primitive.
But innocence means Uncorrupted by evil, malice, or wrongdoing not knowing what is wrong. That is the major difference.
You can say innocent ppl are ingnorant about what is wrong, or the ways of the world and maybe not knowing what is a sin. The ignorance of and innocent person is only limited to evil and the above mentioned.
Wheras ignorant ppl are plain stupid. I never call someone ignorant if they dont know and ask about it and seek knowledge, rather i consider a person ignorant if he holds an adverse judgment or opinion formed beforehand based on his lack of knowledge then only i consider a person ignorant.
Another example would be an innocent scientist, who has found a cure to aids/any other disease and gives the formula to a one of the pharmacutical companies without patenting it based on a promise to provide it free/lowpriced. the company then patents it and charges a fortune for the cure.The scientist here has to be the most knowledgable scientis to have found a cure. But he is innocent because he is only ignorant to the cheating and malice.
I think i just spoke(typed) too much….
I end here.
Nice topic though

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:49:09 +0000

Hi Neha,( I know your name now..:p)
There are many things of which a wise man may wish to be ignorant. And not to know certain things is a great part of wisdom. A wise man sees as much as he ought, not as much as he can.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:30:54 +0000

would be like having the cake and eating it too…….;)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:45:41 +0000

got a question
is it suppose to make any sense…….?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Nov 2005 08:23:29 +0000

Saumik innocense can’t be ignored;its somethin’ which shows up.

Kaustubh thanks for likin’ the blog n makin’ ur presence felt. Well if a child rushes to play with snake then she is ignorant n as soon as she finds the dangers to play with snake she overcums with her ignnorance.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Nov 2005 03:09:16 +0000

A 2 yr. old child (who doesnt know how dangerous King Cobra is) sees the snake and run towards it to play with it.

Is it Innocence or Ignorence??